CODEX ALPE ADRIA 2006 results
fetched from http://0xaa.org/2006/productions/
2006 Edition Demoscene Productions
Codex Alpe Adria 2006 is taking take place From June 30 to July 2nd, 2006. The
following is a very rough and preliminary set of data. This section will be
updated with final results and downloadable productions during the week after
the event.
Votes
24 voters expressed their preference as follows:
A>F>D>G>C>B>H>I>E>J
C>A>F>B>D>G>I>J>E>H
C>F>G>D>B>E>A>I>J>H
C>I>J>F>H>G>E>D>B>A
D>C>F>I>J>H>G>A>B>E
D>G>I>J>A>B>E>H>C>F
E>G>C>F>A>B>D>H>I>J
F>B>A>D>C>E>J>I>H>G
F>C>B>A>J>G>D>H>E>I
F>E>G>B>C>D>A>H>I>J
F>G>B>C>D>A>E>J>I>H
F>G>C>A>H>B>D>E>I>J
F>G>E>C>A>B>H>J>I>D
G>E>C>F>A>H>B>J>D>I
G>F>B>E>C>A>D>I>H>J
G>F>B>I>C>D>A>E>J>H
G>F>C>A>E>B>D>I>J>H
G>F>C>B>A>E>I>D>H>J
G>F>D>E>C>A>I>B>H>J
G>F>E>C>D>B>A>H>J>I
G>F>E>C>D>B>A>I>H>J
C>A>D>B (omitted 6 candidates)
D>H>J>A>B>C>F>J>I>E (double J, omitted G)
F>E>C>G>B>J>A>D>B>I (double B, omitted H)
Reading the Votes
Each line represents a voting sheet (ballot). Votes are ranked by preference.
For example, 13 voters said that they preferred F (Bike 64 Project) over G
(Minimig: an Amiga in an FPGA), while 10 voters said that they considered G
better than F, and one voter expressed no preference on F vs. G. Counting
Because the Schulze method was used for the first time at this event (or at any
such event, from what we know), we relied on expert consultation to handle the
special cases (omissions and duplicates):
* Omissions are automatically grouped at the bottom of the list by the counting
software
* When a voter expresses a multiple ranking for the same candidate, all
instances of the repeated candidate are removed (instead of arbitrarily
removing one of the duplicates, or excluding the entire ballot)
In general we followed the rule that when a voter's vote is ambiguous, the
voter's intent is taken into account to the maximum extent possible.
If you would like, you can repeat the counting with any software or web service
that supports the Schulze method (also known as Beatpath winner). If the
software does not support the creation of a ranked list (but only gives a
single winner) simply choose one winner at a time, then eliminate that
candidate from the ballots, and repeat the process until you have a complete
ranked list.
Combined Results
The combined demo competition results are as follows:
1. (F) Bike 64 Project, by Daniele Redivo (Wild)
2. (G) Minimig: an Amiga in an FPGA, by Dennis van Weeren (Wild)
3. (C) Stars and Stabbers, by K2 (C64 4K Intro)
4. (A) Wish We Were in Italy, by Barry Blitter, Slummy & Dominei (Amiga Demo)
5. (B) Spacekitten, by RNO (Amiga Demo)
6. (D) A Study on Volume Behaviour in Limited Time and Space
by James Tonic/Limp Ninja (PC Demo)
7. (E) 0xAA 2006 T-Shirt, by Takeo Sato (Wild)
8. (I) Catch Me If You Can, by James Tonic (Music)
9. (H) Dogma Crescendo, by Ps (Graphics)
10. (J) Spita, by Soolta (Music)
Results by Category
Amiga
1. Wish We Were in Italy, by Barry Blitter, Slummy & Dominei (Demo)
2. Spacekitten, by RNO (Demo)
C64
1. Stars and Stabbers, by K2 (4K Intro)
PC
1. A Study on Volume Behaviour in Limited Time and Space
by James Tonic/Limp Ninja (Demo)
Wild
1. Bike 64 Project, by Daniele Redivo
2. Minimig: an Amiga in an FPGA, by Dennis van Weeren
3. 0xAA 2006 T-Shirt, by Takeo Sato
Graphics
1. Dogma Crescendo, by Ps
Music
1. Catch Me If You Can, by James Tonic
2. Spita, by Soolta