Preview
SEPTEMBER 1993
Prologue
-------------------
On-Disk Programs
Alcatraz WHQ BBS
Entertainment (DIR)
Charts (DIR)
Personals (DIR)
Miscellaneous (DIR)
-------------------
Epilogue
-------------------
EXIT TO DOS
REALLY WANNA EXIT?
No
Yes
CHARTS!
Chart Policy
-------------------
Musicians
Music Modules
-------------------
MAIN MENU
PERSONAL COLOUMNS
Advertising Policy
-------------------
MAIN MENU
BLADE RUNNER
Introduction ++
Replicants Def.
What Is so-and-so
Voice-Overs/Ending
Different Versions
Memorable Quotes
Unicorn/Chess Game
Problems
Trivia/Popularity
More Q's and A's
Deckard=Replicant?
End Notes
------------------
ENTERTAINMENT MENU
MISCELLANEOUS
Coming ATZ releases
Copyright Notice
Addresses
Credits
-------------------
MAIN MENU
ENTERTAINMENT
Blade Runner (DIR)
-------------------
Jurassic Park 1
Jurassic Park 2
Jurassic Park Game
The Party III
The Party III 1893
-------------------
MAIN MENU
Movies to come in 1993
by IT / Cryptoburners
Credits
On-Disk Programs
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
Alcatraz WHQ BBS --- +4777695151 (77695151)
Movie Review: 'Unforgiven'
by Diceman
Gathering '93 info
Crusaders - Deadline - Exile
Scene News
Movie Review: 'Twin Peaks - Fire Walk With Me'
by Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
BUSTS: The History
by Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
BUSTS: Current Action
by Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
BUSTS: An Analysis
by Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
Movie Review: 'A Few Good Men'
by Diceman
Movie Review: 'Home Alone 2 - Alone in New York'
by Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
Epilogue
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
Prologue
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
ATZ Releases to come
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
Addresses
(C) ALCATRAZ 1993
BUSTS: Business Software Alliance's view
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
BUSTS: The Future
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
The Amiga 1200 is here !
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
Greetings !
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
Frequently Asked Questions About BLADE RUNNER
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - REPLICANTS
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - DEFINITIONS
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - VOICE-OVERS/ENDING
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - DIFFERENT VERSIONS
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - MEMORABLE QUOTES
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - UNICORN & CHESS GAME SIGNIFICANCE
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - PROBLEMS
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - TRIVIA & POPULARITY
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - MORE Q's AND A's
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - IS DECKARD A REPLICANT?
Compiled by: Murray Chapman
BLADE RUNNER (FAQ) - END NOTES
Written by: Murray Chapman
Chart Policy
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
Voted Best Musicians September 1993
Voted Best Music Modules September 1993
Advertising Policy
Jurassic Park Review (1)
by James Berardinelli
Jurassic Park Review (2)
by Mark R. Leeper
Jurassic Park Game Facts
by Micro-Pal/Alcatraz
The Party III Invitation
The Party III - Year 1893
by Wreko/Balance
ðJURASSIC PARK
ð THE GAME!
For 160 billion years, the dinosaurs ruled on planet earth.
Then mankind took over. For the first time, they meet. In
ºJurassic Park.
On October 1st, the famous software house ºOcan will release
their new game - based on and developed during the creation
of this year's movie nuber one: ºJurassic Park. ºOcean has
already made several games based on movies, so one might say
they have some kind of experience. However, this game will
ºnot follow the plot of the film. In the game, you are the
ºdinosaur expert Grant (played by Sam Neill in the movie),
and your ºtask is to fix the sabotaged security network in
the park.
This is not a ºtypical shoot'em up game, and you will,
amongst other things, have to bring John Hammonds grandchild
into security, as well as help an ill stegosaurus which is
blocking the escape route.
You ºwill recognize the movie in the game, but not in the
same way as you have in other "based-on-movie" -games. In
some parts of the game you view the player in the ºthird
person perspective, and in other parts in the ºfirst person
perspective - in other words: What you see is the same as
what your player sees.
Since the game isn't released yet, I'm unable to give you a
full review, but I wanted to pass these facts (or rumors?)
on to you. The game will undoubtly become a box office hit
- just like the movie.
ºOcean plan to release the game on a wide range of computers
and formats, and for the ºAmiga users, I reckon the A1200,
and perhaps the CD32, versions will be most interesting.
So stay tuned!
©Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
ðJURASSIC PARK
A film review by Mark R. Leeper
Copyright 1993 Mark R. Leeper
ºCapsule review: As few films in the past have ever managed
ºto do, Steven Spielberg has tapped into the mother lode of
ºhuman dreams and sense of wonder. Michael Crichton's story
ºmay be "Westworld" with dinosaurs, but for once the
ºbiotechnology and the special effects are phenomenal.
ºRating: high +3.
When Apollo 11 touched down on the moon, I got this
funny feeling in my back and in the back of my neck. This
was where a dream that I'd had became a reality. The
feeling was one of "Oh boy! Here we go!" and one of real
anticipation. In Michael Crichton's novel JURASSIC PARK, a
little girl drew a very detailed picture of the animal that
had bitten her. And the expert looked at the picture and
identified it as a known type of lizard. But several of the
details were wrong in her picture and that type of lizard
was not known to bite people. But the case was closed. And
then someone else looks at the picture and says, "Whose kid
drew the dinosaur?" And even though it was just a story, I
got that same "Oh boy! Here we go!" So I was hoping that
sequence would make it to the film. It didn't. Instead,
paleontologist Alan Grant (played by Sam Neill), not knowing
what the Jurassic Park concept is all about, suddenly sees
an incredibly majestic sight that is undoubtedly something
he had dreamed of his entire life and he is so overcome with
joy and excitement and wonder that he has to look away. And
I was feeling just about the same thing the character was.
"Oh boy! Here we go!" Who hasn't dreamed about getting the
dinosaurs back? Now you can indulge that fantasy for two
hours and people are going to flock to do it.
Michael Crichton's story itself is really a variant on
WESTWORLD. A theme park is created with genuine dinosaurs,
resurrected thanks to the magic of DNA cloning from blood
found in mosquitoes who sucked on dinosaurs and then were
preserved in amber. Two paleontologists, a mathematician,
and a lawyer come to certify that the park is real and safe.
Of course it turns out that the park is very, very real but
just a bit lacking in the safe category. Neill's Grant
epitomizes the stereotype of the soft scientist who does not
get along with machines, even seatbelts. Laura Dern plays
Ellie Sattler, a second paleontologist who lives and works
with Grant, every bit his equal. Like Grant she is at first
enchanted by the island where live dinosaurs live, but soon
discovers that live dinosaurs have their downside also.
Jeff Goldblum has many of the best lines as an obnoxious but
witty chaos mathematician. He uses her acerbic wit to point
out just what can go wrong with the implementation of
billionaire entrepreneur John Hammond's (Richard
Attenborough's) plan for the park. Attenborough finds a
human side to Hammond that is not apparent in the book.
Instead of a vicious maniac for success, he is more
enthusiastic but likable. Other familiar faces include Bob
Peck (who has done some excellent work in the past,
including the BBC's EDGE OF DARKNESS), Martin Ferrero, and
Wayne Knight.
As enjoyable as Crichton's story is, there is much that
cannot be fully appreciated without actually seeing it. No
description can come close to the visual impact of this
film. It has been suggested that JURASSIC PARK ranks with
STAR WARS and KING KONG (1933) as a giant leap in
representing images on the screen. However, there is
actually little here that is really a breakthrough in
technology, though virtually every effect that has ever been
used to show dinosaurs on the screen was resurrected and
perhaps refined. There are hand puppets, dinosaur suits,
stop-motion, and computer graphics, seamlessly and
flawlessly integrated. It took about four decades, but
somebody has finally surpassed Ray Harryhausen at showing
dinosaurs on the screen. It no longer is easy to tell that
this effect is stop-motion and that one was a computer
image, and the dinosaurs look as if they were in the scene
with the people, not rear projections. Clearly inspired
both by the work of Ray Harryhausen and by a recent
revolution in scientific dinosaur art and paleontology,
these dinosaurs show a lot of anatomy, including the
wrinkles, the breathing, the bone structure, and often
tremendous scale. They do not drag their tails on the
ground and even the heaviest sauropods will rear up on their
hind legs to reach the tops of trees. The one major aspect
of modern dinosaur art technical speculation that was left
behind is choice of color. The fossil record, of course, is
silent on the color of dinosaurs and some artists these days
suggest that it is likely that dinosaurs were brightly
colored, but JURASSIC PARK's dinosaurs are dully colored.
Still, the film does give a real air of authenticity. When
the credits say no animals were hurt in the filming, one
wonders, "How did they film that scene without killing that
velociraptor?"
It is a tribute to the special effects that in some of
the horror scenes I was genuinely tense. A really good film
will make me tense, though I have not been actually
frightened by a film since I was nine years old. (And just
as an aside, I treasure those moments when I was young and
actually frightened by film. I did even then, especially
being terrified by WAR OF THE WORLDS before I was three
years old. I am very thankful that nobody "protected" ME
from them.) But along with the horror are also the moments
of joy and wonder. I am pleased that the John Williams
score concentrates on the wonder, not the horror of having
the dinosaurs return. It would be nice if that wonder might
push some younger viewers into fields such as paleontology
that pay off in sense of wonder and fulfillment of
curiosity, even if they are not as financially rewarding.
It helps that JURASSIC PARK is reasonably scientifically
accurate. Most skepticism seems to center around a belief
that dinosaur DNA would deteriorate in amber over the tens
and hundreds of millions of years. You could not really
clone DNA that old. But even that is open to conjecture.
What does seem odd is that at one point early in the script
one of the scientists surprisingly fins a supposedly extinct
leaf from something other than a tree. I do not think
that's its presence is explained by the premise of cloning.
The script does include reasonable debates as to
whether this particular scientific wonder is really what the
world needs. Because it is a disaster story, of course the
anti-science side has the upper hand, though not all the
anti-science articles are convincing. The theme voiced by
the mathematician that life WILL find a way to survive at
first is a warning that the dinosaurs will not be contained,
but eventually applies to the people as well.
The script was co-authored by Crichton, and David Koepp
with more than a little humor borrowed from such diverse
sources as Buster Keaton and Gary Larson, as well as a few
jokes of their own. In total, this is one of the most
enjoyable adventure films in years. I rate it a high +3 on
the -4 to +4 scale, but then I am biased toward science
fiction.
Mark R. Leeper
att!mtgzfs3!leeper
leeper@mtgzfs3.att.com
ðJURASSIC PARK
ºA film review by James Berardinelli
ºCopyright 1993 James Berardinelli
Rating..........: ©8.7 out of 10 (A-, 3 out of 4)
Date Released...: ©6/11/93
Running Length..: ©2:06
Rated......: ©PG-13 (Violence)
Starring...: ©Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Attenborough,
©Laura Dern, Joseph Mazzello, Ariana Richards
Director...: ©Stephen Spielberg
Producers..: ©Kathleen Kennedy and Gerald R. Molen
Screenplay.: ©Michael Crichton and David Koepp based on the
©book by Michael Crichton
Music......: ©John Williams
Released by: ©Universal Pictures
º On a small island off the coast of Costa Rica exists a
ºmost unusual animal preserve by the name of Jurassic Park.
ºOperated by dinosaur lover John Hammond (Richard
ºAttenborough), Jurassic Park is the first of its kind. Its
ºpopulation of creatures includes brachiosaurs, dilophosaurs,
ºtricerotops, velociraptors, and a Tyrannosaurus Rex, each of
ºwhich has been cloned using the latest technology that takes
ºDNA from dinosaur-biting prehistoric insects preserved in
ºamber, and uses that DNA for the re- creation. When the
ºconsortium funding Jurassic Park become concerned that all
ºis not as it should be, Hammond is forced to call in three
ºexperts: paleontologist Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill), his
ºpartner, paleo-botanist Dr. Ellie Sattler (Laura Dern), and
ºthe brilliant-but-cynical mathematician Dr. Ian Malcolm
º(Jeff Goldblum). When the trio arrives at Jurassic Park,
ºthey are astonished by what it represents. It doesn't take
ºlong, however, for astonishment to turn to horror.
First of all, for anyone who's wondering, given the
current state of technology, the situation postulated in
JURASSIC PARK cannot happen. Not only do the necessary
cloning techniques not exist, but the likelihood of
retrieving dinosaur DNA from an amber-encased prehistoric
mosquito is extremely small. While insect specimens have
been unearthed, for there to be dinosaur DNA, circumstances
demand that the mosquito had bitten a dinosaur shortly
before its fatal imprisonment, and the chance of that is
slim, at best.
Nevertheless, the enjoyment of any movie is hardly
predicated by a factual premise. The apparent realism of
some of Crichton's pseudo-science imbues JURASSIC PARK with
a grounding that is acceptable in our high-tech world.
After all, to weave a dinosaur fable in this day and age,
science -- not fantasy -- must be the driving force. The
science may not be real, but it must sound good enough to
allow a suspension of disbelief. In that, this film (and
the book that spawned it) succeeds.
Of course, the special effects help immensely. They
are so good, in fact, and the dinosaurs look so real, that I
half expected to see "dinosaur trainer" during the closing
credits. Instead, however, honor should be heaped upon the
creators of JURASSIC PARK's primary screen presences (all
apologies to the actors). Stan Winston, definitely not a
stranger to this sort of film (his recent credits include
ALIENS and TERMINATOR 2), is credited with the live-action
creatures. Dennis Muren gets his due for the full motion
monsters. Phil Tippett is the "dinosaur supervisor", and
Michael Lantieri presides over the creature effects.
All-in-all, the wizards at ILM have done an outstanding job,
giving us by far the most impressive and believable monster
movie of all time. Nothing compares.
Would that the story is the equal of its execution. To
begin with, Crichton's book, while filled with fascinating
ideas and entertaining moments, hardly holds together as a
top-of-the-line adventure story. The ending is especially
problematic, resulting in a forty-page denouement that drags
slowly to an anticlimactic conclusion. As a result, a
script based closely on the book is bound to suffer from
some of the same problems. Despite numerous small changes
and omissions, the movie JURASSIC PARK is very much faithful
to its printed inspiration. Perhaps Michael Crichton's
involvement in the screenplay has something to do with this.
The biggest weakness of the novel is characterization,
and the same flaw is fully evident in the screen adaptation.
There are a few exceptions. The scenes between Alan and
Ellie at the beginning are well-done, with the affection
between them evident from the start (a change from the book,
where the two were never a couple). This is as much a
tribute to the acting of Sam Neill and Laura Dern as to the
writing. Also noteworthy is a scene where Ellie confronts
Hammond, who's eating a dish of ice cream in the midst of
the crisis. Here, we get a sense of what's going on inside
the old man's head. In the book, he's a mixed-up fanatic,
but in the film, he's made into a sympathetic, albeit
eccentric, figure.
Interestingly, some transposition has gone on between
Hammond's two grandchildren. Tim (Joseph Mazzello) is still
the dinosaur-lover, but the screen's version of the boy is
younger than his sister Alexis (Ariana Richards). The
flip-flop in age creates a difference in their relationship
and they come across as closer and less-adversarial on
screen. Also, here it's Alexis, not Tim, who's the computer
whiz.
The plot is little more than a cleverly
jumbled-together batch of formulas. As I mentioned before,
JURASSIC PARK is, reduced to its most basic level, a monster
movie. Thrown in for good measure is the human interest
story -- the growing relationship between self-confessed
child-hater Grant and his two youthful charges -- but this
part of the film worked least successfully for me. Also,
there isn't an effective ending. Too much is left dangling,
demanding that the lion's share of the resolution be
confined to the imagination, but at least the movie avoids
the book's plodding conclusion. Nevertheless, I doubt that
there are many who will go to JURASSIC PARK for its
characters or story. Rightly so, crowds will flock to the
theaters screening this movie so they can ooh and aah, jump
in their seats, and root for the overmatched humans against
the big, bad dinosaurs. When it comes to adventure,
JURASSIC PARK is a roller - coaster ride. With thrills and
action in the tradition of, but not up to the level of,
ALIENS and RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK (another Spielberg
picture), this is an exciting and energetic film with a
number of shocks but few letdowns. Even those familiar with
the written work can't help being drawn in to the pulse-
pounding exhilaration of the chase as the Tyrannosaurus
menaces two powerless electric cars and the trapped humans
inside.
In the end, JURASSIC PARK succeeds because it's good
entertainment -- a fun night at the movies. Unlike something
of the ilk of CLIFFHANGER, which also boasts a lot of
action, there's some intelligence behind this picture.
JURASSIC PARK isn't great art, nor is it classic cinema, but
at least we don't feel like the producers and director are
more interested in getting as much firepower and death
on-screen as they can without giving a thought as to whether
anyone in the audience has a brain.
Not having seen all of the summer's offerings (THE LAST
ACTION HERO is still a week away), I can't say how JURASSIC
PARK will rate overall, but I will admit that, in my
opinion, this is the first big-budget film in a long time to
live up to its pre-release reputation. Sure, the movie
isn't perfect, but it delivers -- perhaps more than
delivers -- what the average viewer will expect from it.
Summer has long been known as the season for
action/adventure films, and JURASSIC PARK falls firmly into
that category.
Because of the nature and scope of this movie, I would
encourage anyone with more than a passing interest to catch
JURASSIC PARK in a movie theater. It will lose a lot on the
smaller TV screen. Without the grandeur of a stereophonic
sound system and sizeable picture, much of this film's
impact will dwindle away. The dinosaurs will still look
real, but there will undoubtedly be some who, upon viewing
JURASSIC PARK on video, will wonder what all the fuss is
about.
To this praise, let me add a final word of caution.
While the violence in this film is not particularly graphic,
it is apparent. People aren't shown getting gored or ripped
apart, but the movie makes it perfectly clear what is
happening. Parents considering taking young children (under
around 10 years of age) to JURASSIC PARK might be advised to
see the film first. There are certainly a number of scary
and potentially-disturbing moments which, while they add to
the spice for older viewers, may be inappropriate for
younger ones.
- James Berardinelli (blake7@cc.bellcore.com)
S i l e n t s
L e m o n .
S p a c e b a l l s
.-------------------------.
| |
| T H E P A R T Y |
| |
| 1 9 9 3 |
| |
`-------------------------'
You Can't Beat The Feeling!
WHERE AND WHEN?
The Party 1993 will be held in Scandinavia's largest conference centre.
The centre is called Messecenter Herning and it is of course placed in
Herning in the middle of Denmark. The Party will be held from Monday 27
December at 10:00 CET to Wednesday 29 December at 15:00 CET.
FACILITIES:
- Room for at least 3000 people, including tables, chairs and aircondition.
- A quiet, separate hall for sleeping. But you are free to sleep where you
want to.
- Enormous free parking area. Bring your tent or caravan.
- If you are going by train or bus, you will arrive at Herning Station.
Here the public bus no. 4c and a nonstop party bus will be driving to
the party place. The ride takes 12 min. and costs app. 10 DKK. At
the station there will be 2 organizers to help you getting to the party
place.
- Enough electricity for everyone, with a professional electrician 24
hours a day to avoid problems.
- All info about what's going on (competitions, surprises, winners etc.)
will be published on a large bulletin board in the entrance area, on the
big screen and on The Party Channel.
- 600 x 400 cm high quality screen for competitions and other events.
- Extremely powerful HI-FI equipment to guarantee perfect sound quality.
- Two real cafeterias will be open all day. At night only one of them
will be open. A kiosk and a hot-dog stand will also be open most of the
day. The prices will be low.
- This year everyone who bring a TV-set and an antenna will be able to
watch The Party Channel. The Party Channel is an information and
entertainment channel with movies, live broadcast of the competitions,
all the latest info, news, results etc.
- A Laserdisc room with chairs for 500 people, a big screen and dolby pro
logic surround sound, showing new laserdiscs 24 hours a day!
- The toilet and shower facilities are good. This year we have more than
25 free showers.
- Professional cleaning company to ensure that you will be able to walk
around in the hall.
- The Party 1993 T-Shirts and disks will be sold at the Information.
- Female organizers!
EVENTS:
- 24 hours entertainment.
- Many strange and crazy surprise competitions.
- If you have made a video, a harddisk-based demo or another amazing
thing, bring it with you and we will gladly show it at the big screen.
Just hand in the production at the Information.
SURPRISE:
- Brand new Kyd/Balle Video Production!
COMPETITIONS:
- The main Amiga competitions and prizes:
Demo Compo Gfx Compo Music Compo Intro Compo AGA-Demo Compo
---------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------------
1. $3000 1. $500 1. $500 1. $500 1. $500
2. $1500 2. $300 2. $300 2. $250 2. $300
3. $750 3. $200 3. $200 3. $100 3. $100
4. $500 4. $100 4. $100
5. $250 5. $50 5. $50
RULES:
- Overall Demo/Gfx/Music/Intro/AGA rules:
- All contributions must be delivered at the Information
before the dead-line.
- If you want to take part in a competition you must be present
at the party.
- Demo Competition:
- A group can contribute with as many demos as they want to but
only 1 from each coder.
- Max. demo lenght: 20 min.
- The demo must be able to run on a standard Amiga 500 (1.3)
with 1MB memory.
- Gfx Competition:
- Each artist is allowed to contribute with 1 picture.
- The picture must be loadable from a standard Deluxe Paint IV
(not AGA).
- Music Competition:
- Each musician is allowed to contribute with 1 tune.
- We will play a maximum of 5 minutes per module.
- Your tune must be delivered as an executeable file or with
the music-program required.
- Intro Competition:
- Max. intro length: 40KB.
- The intro must be able to run on a standard 1MB Amiga 500.
- AGA Demo Competition:
- Max. demo length: 20 min.
- The demo must be able to run on a standard Amiga 1200.
ENTRANCE PRICE:
- Due to the extra events, facilities, competitions, prices etc. the
entrance fee will be 150 DKK.
PLEASE NOTE:
- We will not accept anybody selling food, disks etc. without our
written permission.
- Alcohol is not allowed at the party place.
- People who cannot behave will be thrown outside until they can, real
troublemakers will ofcourse be handed over to the police located close
to the party place.
- We will not accept any racist signs or acting, spraycans or firework.
- People who cause any damages will ofcourse have to pay for it.
- We take no responsibility for illegal swapping, software, video etc.
- A special diskmag will be released primo november with detailed
information about the party and how to get there.
ADDRESSES:
Party place: Organizers/Registration: The Party-phone:
------------ ------------------------ ----------------
Messecenter Herning The Party 1993 For info and registration
Vardevej 1 Postbox 755 (+45) 98 15 17 31
7400 Herning 9100 Aalborg
Denmark Denmark
Modem-registration: Net-registration:
------------------- -----------------
Mainline BBS Internet: sauber90@kom.auc.dk
Silents DKHQ Amixnet : Dux@DK0001
(+45) 98 15 30 62
(NOTE: This phonenumber will change by 1/9)
TO REGISTER:
Fill in this slip and send it to one af the addresses above:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, we are coming to The Party 1993
Name/handle:
Group:
Country:
Number of persons coming:
Number of computers: Amigas.:
C-64's.:
PC's...:
Do you want to reserve tables? Yes/No
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information about The Party 1993 you can call The
Party-Phone or read The Party Mag released in early November!
THE PARTY III - YEAR 1893 ..
============================
This textfile was written after I read the text-invitation
to The Party III, held by Silents, Lemon, and Spaceballs at
the 27-29 Dec. 1993.
The only thing I really think SUXX are the prizes, $3000 for
the old boring A500 demos, and only $500 for the AGA demo
competition ??? Hey wake up, we're living in 1993 and NOT
in 1893. I don't think the organisers of this party knows
how many freaks at the Amigascene has got an A1200 or A4000,
but who wants to release anything with that low prizes at
the competitions ??
I really thought that The Party III should be the party
which broke the limits and took the step into the FUTURE, by
giving high prizes for the AGA demos, but I got REALLY
dissapointed when I read the invitation.. I really know a
lot of groups which had plans for releasing their first BIG
AGA demo at this party, and so did we (Balance), but I
HIGHLY doubt that any of these demos will be released,
of course they will be released but NOT at this party..
There has been some rumours going on since quite a time ago,
that there would be good prizes at The Party III for AGA
demos, and people really believed in these rumours, since
the 'The Party' series has been the greatest parties ever
held, and why should the third in the series not be just as
great!!?
I must say that you (the organisers) really let quite a lot
of people down, by these lousy prizes... My opinion would
be to take $1000 from the normal demo competition and use
for the AGA competition, so that there would be $2000 for
the normal demos, and $1500 for the AGA competition..
Otherwise I'm afraid that there only will be released very
small and boring demos in the AGA competition ..
Another BAD thing is the GFX competition, NO AGA pictures,
WHAT ??? Do you know how many graphicians who has bought an
A1200 or A4000 because of their new limits with the AGA
chipset ?? If I was a graphician I would be really down by
not be able to compete with my AGA pictures, and since the
coders don't want to release their demos either, they will
not be able to get their graphics used for anything at this
party ..
I'd really like to get some response from this text, to hear
what other people thinks of this ...
Write a message to me at one of these boards, or write
directly to me at this address ..
Wreko / Balance
Amagerbrogade 263a ST.TV
2300 Copenhagen S
Denmark
Phone: +45 31-519525
ð ADVERTISING POLICY
Advertisements in Peanuts are limited to one per person,
unless we are paid to include more than the one, free
advert. The advert must not exceed the 80x13 format
(width=80, height=13). Of course - you may make your advert
smaller.
Furthermore, advertisements must not encourage piracy or any
kind of illegal actions.
Your ad must be mailed no later than the 20th if you want to
include it in the following issue. If you live outside
Europe, please send your ad (and votes!) a few days ahead of
the above date.
Mail your advertisement - and votes - to this address:
TEO/Alcatraz
Vassosvn. 14
N-8481 BLEIK
NORWAY
BLADE RUNNER
Frequently Asked Questions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compiled by Murray Chapman (muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au), from sources too numerous to
mention. Thank-you one and all.
Please send your contributions/corrections/donations/suggestions to
muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au. Articles posted to the net are not 100% guaranteed to be
seen by me. Please read the notes at the end of this file before mailing me.
INTRODUCTION
------------
The movie "Blade Runner" is one of the internet's most talked about movies. In
an attempt to stop the same questions being asked and answered every few months
or so, I present the Blade Runner FAQ.
This list will be posted monthly to: alt.cult-movies, rec.arts.movies,
alt.cyberpunk, and rec.arts.sf.movies. The list will appear in news.answers
and rec.answers as soon as I can sort out a few problems.
The followup field is set to alt.cult-movies, because it is the most relevant
newsgroup for Blade Runner discussions.
The list is available for anonymous FTP as:
ftp.u.washington.edu:/public/alt.cyberpunk/FAQS/BladeRunner.FAQ
nic.funet.fi:pub/culture/tv+film/BladeRunner
Suggestions welcome for all areas, especially those marked with []s.
This FAQ contains spoilers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTENTS
--------
1. What is Blade Runner?
2. What book is it based on?
3. Is the sound track available?
4. What are replicants?
5. Who/what is <so-and-so>?
6. I don't like the voice-overs/ending.
7. What different versions of Blade Runner are there?
8. Memorable Quotes
9. What is the significance of the unicorn?
10. What is the significance of the chess game?
11. Problems in Blade Runner
12. Trivia / What makes Blade Runner popular/special?
13. More questions/answers
14. Is Deckard a replicant?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. WHAT IS BLADE RUNNER?
Blade Runner (BR) is a science-fiction film starring Harrison Ford, Rutger
Hauer, Sean Young, and Daryl Hannah. Although it was a box-office failure, it
has become perhaps the definitive cult movie, and is one of the few films which
remain faithful to the ideals of 20th century science fiction literature.
Blade Runner was directed by Ridley Scott, and features music by Vangelis.
Plot Synopsis
-------------
Preamble from movie:
Early in the 21st Century, THE TYRELL
CORPORATION advanced Robot evolution
into the NEXUS phase -- a being virtually
identical to a human -- known as replicants.
The NEXUS 6 Replicants were superior
in strength and agility, and at least equal
in intelligence, to the genetic engineers
who created them.
Replicants were used Off-world as
slave labor, in the hazardous exploration and
colonization of other planets.
After a bloody mutiny by a NEXUS 6
combat team in an Off-world colony,
Replicants were declared illegal
on earth -- under penalty of death.
Special police squads -- BLADE RUNNER
UNITS -- had orders to shoot to kill, upon
detection, any trespassing Replicants.
This was not called execution.
It was called retirement.
LOS ANGELES
NOVEMBER, 2019
A number of replicants have made it to Earth, and ex-Blade Runner Deckard
(Harrison Ford) is convinced to track them down.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. WHAT BOOK IS IT BASED ON?
Blade Runner is LOOSELY based on a Philip K. Dick novella, "Do Androids
Dream of Electric Sheep" (DADoES). Dick also wrote the story that _Total
Recall_ was based on, "We Can Remember It For You, Wholesale". A recurring
theme in Dick's work is the question of personal and human identity. A
question explored more in DADoES and _Total Recall_ than in Blade Runner is
"what is reality?"
At the most, one can say that the movie borrowed a concept and some characters
from the book.
You are most likely to find DADoES in a second-hand bookstore. It has been
re-released as: "Blade Runner (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?)."
The title comes from Alan E. Nourse, who wrote a story called "The Bladerunner".
William S. Burroughs took the book and wrote "Bladerunner (A Movie)" in 1979.
Rights to the title only ("in perpetuity throughout the universe") were sold to
Ridley Scott. Similarities between Nourse's "The Bladerunner" and Scott's BR
are in name only. Nourse's title refers to people who deliver medical
instruments to outlaw doctors who can't obtain them legally.
[Source: Locus, September 1992 (p. 76)]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. IS THE SOUND TRACK AVAILABLE?
The original movie soundtrack has never been officially released, although the
credits claim it is available on Polydor records.
There is an album called the "Blade Runner Soundtrack" (WEA 1982), but it is
NOT the music from the movie, rather it is an orchestral arrangement.
Vangelis released an album called "Themes", which contains:
"End Titles"
"Love Theme"
"Memories of Green" (originally from Vangelis' "See You Later")
There are recurring but unsubstatiated rumors that a few LPs of the real
soundtrack were sold in Europe.
Scott used the orchestrated version of "Memories of Green" in his film _Someone
to Watch Over Me_
The Japanese vocals associated with the Blimp are from:
"Japan: Traditional Vocal and Instrumental Music, Shakuhachi,
Biwa, Koto, Shamisen" [compact disc]
- performed by Ensemble Nipponia
- 1976, Electra Asylum Nonesuch Records/Warner Communications Inc.
The lyrics are part of a Japanese epic about the tragic and utter
destruction of one clan by another.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ð CHART POLICY!
All diskmags have some kind of chart. Although Peanuts isn't
a pure diskmag, the idea about a few charts shouldn't be
ruled out. Chart entrys often tend to stay at the same spot
for ages, so we've decided to have only charts that will
change a bit as the time passes, and this time it is
narrowed down to two charts: ºMusicians and ºMusic Modules.
µThe rules are very easy:¡
You can vote for up to 5 musicians and 5 modules. You write
the one you think is "best" at the top, and then the rest...
You can ºnot vote for yourself or any member of your group.
You ºcan vote for Alcatraz members, but you don't have to :-)
The first place will be assigned 35 floats, the second will
get 30 floats and so on... if you'd like to assign a lot of
floats to the same musician, just enter the same name on
several lines...
A vote-sheet could look something like this:
MUSICIANS:
1. UNCLE TOM (35)
2. AXEL (30)
3. DR. AWESOME (20)
4. WALKMAN (10)
5. BRUNO ( 5)
Total floats: (100)
MODULES:
1. Summer In Gambia (Lizardking) (35)
2. Klisje Paa Klisje (Walkman) (30)
3. Tranze 7 (Dr. Awesome) (20)
4. Vanja (Brainbug) (10)
5. In The Kitchen (4-Mat) ( 5)
Total floats: (100)
There will be a new layout on the charts next time, with
points, percentage etc. information.
The charts have, this time, been compiled with the votes from
very few people; only five people have contributed with
their votes. Peanuts will be released on a regular basis
from now on, and the votes for the next issue must be sent
µno later¡ than the 20th each month for Europeans, 2-3 days
earlier for non-Europeans. All votes receieved after the
24th will ºnot be accounted for until the next issue!
For those of you who decide to mail your votes:
1. Write your votes on a piece of paper (or equivalent) and
mail it to the address below. Remember to include your
handle, name and address! (Do ºnot send votes on disk!)
2. If you want a disk with the next issue of Peanuts in
return, please enclose º3 disks in the letter; one for us
to send back to you, and two for us to keep as payment for
postage and work. Note that the disks has to be ºerror-free,
else you will not get any disks in return.
You can also vote online on the ºAlcatraz WHQ BBS, just enter
the Peanuts area in the message base. There will be
information in the Peanuts area entry text on how to vote.
If you don't know it already, the number is +©4777695151...
----------
Each month, we will make a draw among the voters, and the
winner will get a ºpresent in the mail :-)) So just keep 'em
votes coming!
Mail your votes (either only the sheet, or the sheet and 3
disks for the diskback service) to the following address:
TEO/Alcatraz
Vassosvn. 14
N-8481 BLEIK
NORWAY
PS..... Please state º"Peanuts Votes" on the envelope!
PS2.... Send your votes to TEO (this address) and ºNOT to
Micro-Pal :-) (I don't like to count... ed.)
ðVOTED BEST MUSICIANS
Audiomonster
Nuke
Brainbug
Heatbeat
Lizardking
4-Mat
Dr. Awesome
Fleshbrain
Walkman
Bruno
Axel
Uncle Tom
ð VOTED BEST MODULES
Klisjé Paa Klisjé (Walkman)
In The Kitchen (4-Mat)
Vanja (Brainbug)
Lizardking's Theme (Lizardking)
Summer In Gambia (Lizardking)
Tranze 7 (Dr. Awesome)
Jammin' For Nothing (Heatbeat)
Bodweizer/McDisk4 (Brainbug)
Macabra (Dr. Awesome)
Technolife (Codex)
70's (Audiomonster)
Now What ??? (Dr. Awesome)
4. WHAT ARE REPLICANTS?
The following definitions appear in the BR script, the Marvel Comics adaptation
of the film, but not the movie itself:
_android_ (an'droid) adj. Possessing human features -n.
A synthetic man created from biological materials.
Also called humanoid. (Late Greek androeides,
manlike: ANDR(O) - OID.)
THE AMERICAN HERITAGE
DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH
LANGUAGE (1976)
_android_ (an'droid) n, Gk. humanoid automation. more at
robot./ 1. early version utilized for work too
boring, dangerous or unpleasant for humans.
2. second generation bio-engineered. Electronic
relay units and positronic brains. Used in space
to explore inhospitable environments. 3. third
generation synthogenetic. REPLICANT, constructed
of skin/flesh culture. Selected enogenic transfer
conversion. Capable of self perpetuating thought.
Paraphysical abilities. Developed for emigration
program.
WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY
New International (2012)
Replicants are manufactured organisms designed to carry out work too boring,
dangerous, or distasteful for humans.
The new "NEXUS 6" replicants are nearly indistinguishable from humans. (An
early draft of the script contained an autopsy scene, in which the surgeons
were unaware that the body they were examining was a replicant, until two hours
into the procedure.)
Replicants differ from humans in one important factor: they are lacking in
empathy. In BR, replicants' eyes glow, however Ridley Scott has stressed that
this is merely a cinematic technique, and the glow can't be seen by the
characters in the story, only by the audience.
A test, called the "Voight-Kampff Test" (VK) is administered to determine if
the subject is a human by trying to elicit an empathetic response.
NEXUS 6 (and possibly all other) replicants are manufactured by the Tyrell
Corporation, although there is evidence that third party manufacturers are
utilized. (Chew's Eye World). Replicants can endure greater pain than humans,
and are generally physically superior. NEXUS 6 replicants have a in-built
fail-safe mechanism, namely a four year lifespan.
It was noticed that replicants had eccentricities because they were emotionally
immature. Rachael was a NEXUS 6 replicant with experimental memory implants,
designed to provide a cushion for her emotions. Consequently, she was unaware
that she was a replicant.
5. WHO/WHAT IS <SO-AND-SO>?
"BLADE RUNNER" GLOSSARY (from the 1982 Presskit)
------------------------------------------------
BLADE RUNNER -- The nickname given to those police detectives who are
specially trained in the use of the Voight-Kampff machine and whose
specific function is to track down and eliminate any replicants that
manage to escape into human society and attempt to pass as real human
beings. The official name of the Blade Runner division is Rep-
Detect.
REPLICANT -- A genetically engineered creature composed entirely of
organic substance. Animal replicants (animoids) were developed first
for use as pets and beasts of burden after most real animals became
extinct. Later, humanoid replicants were created for military
purposes and for the exploration and colonization of space. The
Tyrell Corp. recently introduced the Nexus 6, the supreme replicant -
- much stronger and faster than, and virtually indistinguishable
from, real human beings. Earth law forbids replicants on the planet,
except in the huge industrial complex where they are created. The
law does not consider replicants human and therefore accords them no
rights nor protection.
ESPER -- A high-density computer with a very powerful three-
dimensional resolution capacity and a cryogenic cooling system. The
police cars and Deckard's apartment contain small models which can be
channeled into the large one at police headquarters. This big
apparatus is a well-worn, retro-fitted part of the furniture. Among
many functions, the Esper can analyze and enlarge photos, enabling
investigators to search a room without being there.
VOIGHT-KAMPFF MACHINE -- A very advanced form of lie detector that
measures contractions of the iris muscle and the presence of
invisible airborne particles emitted from the body. The bellows were
designed for the latter function and give the machine the menacing
air of a sinister insect. The V-K is used primarily by blade runners
to determine if a suspect is truly human by measuring the degree of
his empathic response through carefully worded questions and
statements.
SPINNER -- The generic term for all flying cars in use around the
year 2020. Only specially authorized people and police are licensed
to operate these remarkable vehicles, which are capable of street
driving, vertical lift-off, hovering and high-speed cruising. The
Spinner is powered by three engines -- conventional internal
combustion, jet and anti-gravity.
Behind the Scenes
-----------------
RIDLEY SCOTT: Director. A veteran television commercial maker, Scott
consistently makes quality movies. His feature-film credits include:
The Duellists, Alien, Blade Runner, Someone to Watch Over Me, Legend,
Black Rain, Thelma and Louise, 1492. Ridley's brother Tony is also a
director, and his film credits include Top Gun, The Last Boy Scout, and
Days of Thunder.
MICHAEL DEELEY: Producer. Acadamy Award winner for producing "The Deer Hunter"
SYD MEAD: Visual Futurist: Syd Mead suggested using the term "visual futurist"
for his credit in the Blade Runner movie. (As he is not a union/guild member,
he could not use credits such as "creative designer".)
He has been co-sponsoring an International Student Design Competition
with Sony since 1989.
Some of his works are:
California Pavilion, Seville Expo (1992)
Future Terminal, for Japan Railways East (1990)
Club Car, for Japan Railways East (1990)
Dr. Jeekans [This is futuristic cafe/video arcade in Tokyo.] (1990)
Office for the Future, for Okamura Furniture Co, Japan (1989)
Club House (Tokyo Bayside Project) (1989)
Tron Computer (1988)
San Rio Theatre (1987)
Office of the Future, for GE (1985)
LAWRENCE G. PAULL: Production Designer. Holds degrees in Architecture and
City Planning, his feature-film credits include: Blue Collar, Which Was Is Up?,
and The Star Spangled Girl".
DAVID SNYDER: Art director.
VANGELIS (Evangelos Papathanassiou): Greek Composer. He has written numerous
movie scores, perhaps the most famous being for "Chariots of Fire". Also
wrote some of the music for the TV series "Cosmos". Prio to writing movie
scores, Vangelis was the keyboard player of the band "Aphrodite's Child".
Vangelis wrote the score for Scott's 1992 film: _1492_.
[I lost the discography that someone sent me... can you send it again, please?]
HAMPTON FANCHER, DAVID PEOPLES: Screenplay writers. Peoples wrote Clint
Eastwood's _Unforgiven_
JORDAN CRONENWETH: Cinematographer. (Altered States, Stop Making Sense)
DOUGLAS TRUMBULL: Special Effects (2001: A Space Odyssey, Brainstory (also
directed))
On Screen
---------
DECKARD (Harrison Ford): (Ex) Blade Runner.
DR ELDON TYRELL (Joe Turkel): Owner/Chairman of the Tyrell Corp,
manufacturers of replicants. Extremely intelligent, designed the NEXUS 6 brain
RACHAEL (Sean Young): Prototype NEXUS 6 replicant. Works for Tyrell.
ROY BATTY (Rutger Hauer): Leader of the renegade replicants.
INCEPT DATE: 8 Jan, 2016
FUNCTION: Combat, Colonization Defense Prog
PHYS: A MENT: A
PRIS (Daryl Hannah): Replicant, (Bryant: "Yer standard pleasure model")
INCEPT DATE: 14 Feb, 2016
FUNCTION: Military/leisure
PHYS: A MENT: B
ZHORA (Joanna Cassidy): Replicant.
INCEPT DATE: 12 June, 2016
FUNCTION: Retrained (9 Feb, 2018) Polit. Homicide
PHYS: A MENT: B
LEON KOWALSKI (Brion James): Replicant.
INCEPT DATE: 10 April, 2017
FUNC: Combat/loader (Nuc. Fus.)
PHYS: A MENT: C
J F SEBASTIAN (William Sanderson): Genetic designer for the Tyrell Corporation.
Still on Earth because of a premature geriactricism (Methuselah's Syndrome).
Has defeated Tyrell once in chess.
M BRYANT (M Emmett Walsh): Inspector of the Police force, Deckard's former boss
GAFF (Edward James Olmos): A member of the Police Force. Makes origami.
HOLDEN (Morgan Paull): Blade Runner, shot by Leon.
6. I DON'T LIKE THE VOICE-OVERS/ENDING.
Ridley Scott made BR in a style called "film noir". Film noir is the
"hardboiled detective" style of story-telling, perhaps the most famous example
is the Humphrey Bogart movie "The Maltese Falcon" (directed by John Huston). A
characteristic of film noir is the voice-overs by the detective, explaining
what he is thinking/doing at the time.
Having said that, it is interesting to note that Ridley Scott originally
made BR *without* the voice-overs, but due to it's poor reception when
sneak previewed, the studio insisted that the voice-overs be added. Ridley
Scott has said in an interview on American television that in film noir,
voice-overs sometimes work, and sometimes don't, and they didn't work in BR.
"(A)n extensive voice-over was added to help people relate to Harrison Ford's
character and make following the plot easier. (A)fter a draft by novelist-
screenwriter Darryl Ponicsan was discarded, a TV veteran named Roland Kibbee
got the job. As finally written, the voice-over met with universal scorn from
the filmmakers, mostly for what Scott characterized as its 'Irving the
Explainer' quality.... It sounded so tinny and ersatz that, in a curious bit
of film folklore, many members of the team believe to this day that Harrison
Ford, consciously or not, did an uninspired reading of it in the hopes it
wouldn't be used. And when co-writers Fancher and Peoples, now friends, saw it
together, they were so afraid the other had written it that they refrained from
any negative comments until months later."
[Source: Locus, September 1992]
The ending of the film was also changed by the studio. Scott wanted to end
the film with Deckard and Rachael getting into the elevator, but the studio
decided that the film needed a happier, less ambiguous ending. The aerial
landscape photography used in the theatrical release was outtakes from Stanley
Kubrik's _The Shining_.
In 1992, Ridley Scott released a "Director's Cut" of Blade Runner (BRDC), which
eliminates the voice-overs and the happy ending. This version is discussed
in more detail below.
7. WHAT DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF BLADE RUNNER ARE THERE?
- US sneak preview, (1982, very limited release in 1991)
- US theatrical release (1982)
- European/LD cut (more violence)
- Director's Cut (BRDC) (1992)
Ridley Scott re-released the sneak preview at select movie festivals in
1991. There were rumours that THIS version was the director's cut, but that
did not appear until 1992.
Hampton Fancher did eight drafts of the screenplay. These drafts concluded
with Deckard taking Rachael out of the city, letting her see nature for the
first time, and then, because she has only a few days to live, shooting her in
the snow. David Peoples was brought in to polish the script, and Ridley Scott
asked him to make the plot include more clues. Peoples worked on the humanity
of Deckard's adversaries, and in fact his daughter mentioned the biological
term "replicate", which led to "replicant".
[Source: Los Angeles Times Magazine, September 13, 1992 (p. 20).]
Theatrical vs Sneak preview:
----------------------------
- voiceovers added
- voiceover after Roy's death lengthened
- removed eulogy and appreciation for replicants
- added philosophical musings
LD vs Theatrical:
-----------------
- added footage
- Batty sticks his thumbs in Tyrell's eyes, which bleed copiously.
- Pris lifts Deckard up by his nostrils when she beats him up.
- Deckard shoots Pris an extra time.
- More of Pris kicking and screaming when she is shot by Deckard.
- More of Roy putting the nail through his hand, in particular the hand
with the nail popping through and then flexing.
- Total added footage is about 15 seconds.
BRDC vs Theatrical:
-------------------
- Dubbed footage
- Bryant tells Deckard that there are "five skin jobs walking the street",
not six.
- Added footage
- Added dialog from blimp to cover missing voice-over while Deckard waits
for a seat at the noodle bar.
- Unicorn scene when Deckard plays piano and falls asleep (about 12 seconds)
- Removed footage
- No happy ending, movie ends with closing elevator door
- no extra violence.
Soundtrack completely redone digitally for BRDC and is more prominent.
LASERDISCS:
-----------
In the NTSC markets (M/NTSC 3.58 525/60: US and Japan), there have been up
to four versions of Blade Runner continuously available on laserdisc for
the last several years. They are all the 118 minute European or home-video
edition.
Ignoring the Japanese edition(s), we have:
* Criterion Collection CC1120L, $90, CAV, 2.2:1 letterboxed, 4 sides,
digital stereo, CX/analog stereo, 3M pressing, extensive still-frame
supplements.
* Criterion Collection CC1169L, $50, CLV, 2.2:1 letterboxed, 2 sides,
digital stereo, CX/analog stereo, Pioneer pressing, (no supplements).
* Embassy (Nelson Ent.) 13806, $35, CLV, 1.3:1 panned&scanned, 2 sides,
CX/analog stereo, Pioneer pressing, (no digital sound, no supplements)
The Embassy LD is also available as an identical VHS release, and both are
inferior to the Criterion discs.
All video tapes as of 1 January 1993 are the Not Rated version with the
extra violence that was removed from the 117 minute American theatrical
release.
The Criterion and Japanese laserdiscs correspond to this version of the film.
All other laserdiscs (Embassy & Nelson), regardless of what the jacket claims,
are identical to the American theatrical release.
PUBLICATIONS:
-------------
SCRIPTS:
Script City
8033 Sunset Blvd.
PO Box 1500
Hollywood, CA 90046
U.S.A.
US Phone: 213-871-0707 (inquiries)
1-800-676-2522 (orders only)
- Blade Runner script early draft--7/24/80. $24.95 plus $4.50 for
First Class shipping.
- Blade Runner script early draft--12/22/80. $24.95 plus $4.50 for
First Class shipping.
- Blade Runner final script--5/10/81. $17.00 plus $4.50 for First
Class shipping. Note that date on the cover is 23 February 1981 but
it contains numerous changes dated as late as 16 June 1981. This
is considered the final shooting script.
- Blade Runner Storyboards. $16.95 plus $4.50 for First Class
shipping. Note this is only the storyboards for the first half of
the film, the set is not complete.
If you order three or all four items, the total postage is $10.50.
Cinema City
P.O. Box 1012
Muskegon, MI 49443
US Phone: 616-722-7760
Blade Runner script ($55.00 + postage)
The Blade Runner Sketchbook
- early monochrome production drawings, conceptual sketches of items
to be found in LA in 2019.
- Parking meters
- Stop light trees
- Door keys
- Magazine racks
- Blade Runner pistol
- VK machine
- sketches of Tyrell's "coffin", a cryogenic unit holding his body in
suspended animation until future technology can revitalize him. His
casket looked similar to cryo units onboard Discovery in Stanley
Kubrik's _2001: A Space Odyssey_
- A Virtual Reality mask. Worn over your face, a person used software
disks to enjoy various moods of pleasure. Supposedly erotic stuff.
- A stage where the dancers performed. (Like a small amphitheater)
- out of print, a collector's item.
Retrofitting Blade Runner:
Issues in Ridley Scott's _Blade Runner_ and Philip
K. Dick's _Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?_
Judith B. Kerman, editor, 1991, 291 pages
Bowling Green State University Press, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
- detailed, scene-by-scene analysis.
"The Blade Cuts", Starburst (UK) no. 51, November 1982. Phil Edwards.
8. MEMORABLE QUOTES.
RACHAEL:
"Is this testing whether I'm a replicant, or a lesbian, Mr Deckard?"
DECKARD:
"I've had people walk out on me before, but not when I was being
so charming."
CHEW:
"I design your eyes"
ROY BATTY:
"Chew, if only you could see what I've seen with your eyes!"
"It's not an easy thing to meet your maker."
"I want more life, father!"
(some versions sound like: "I want more life, fucker!")
"I've done . . . questionable things . . . but nothing that the
God of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for."
"Six, seven! Go to hell or go to heaven!"
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Attacks ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Time to die."
TYRELL:
"The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long...
...and you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy."
LEON:
"My mother... let me tell you about my mother!"
"Nothing's worse than having an itch you can never scratch!"
"Wake up! Time to die!"
SEBASTIAN:
"I MAKE friends."
GAFF:
"It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who does?"
9. WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE UNICORN?
When Deckard leaves his apartment with Rachael at the end of the film, she
knocks over an origami unicorn, probably left there by Gaff.
The voiceover speculates that the unicorn was simply a message to Deckard to
say "I know you've got Rachael, but I'll let her live."
The unicorn is the last of a series of origami figures that Gaff uses to taunt
Deckard. In Bryant's office when Deckard insists he's retired, Gaff folds a
chicken: "You're afraid to do it". Later he makes a man with an erection:
"You've got the hots for her". And finally, the unicorn: "You're dreaming, you
can run away with her, but she won't live" (he says basically the same thing to
Deckard on the rooftop).
A unicorn has long been the symbol of virginity and purity (being white), which
ties in with Rachel's status. Legend states that only a VIRGIN could capture a
unicorn. Unicorns are extinct, and Gaff may think the same of Rachael, as she
definitely has a limited lifespan.
A unicorn was used in Tennessee Williams' "The Glass Menagerie" to symbolize
that the girl was "different to other horses". The horn on this unicorn
represented her physical handicap, which prevented her from meeting people.
When she finally did meet a man, they danced and knocked over the unicorn,
breaking its horn off. "It's just like all the other horses now.", she said,
which symbolizes that she has overcome her shyness/lost her virginity.
The unicorn may symbolize one of the following:
- Rachael is (and always will be) a replicant among humans, and will
be different, like a unicorn among horses, because of her termination
date. (In the tacked-on ending, Deckard says that she doesn't have a
termination date)
- Rachael leaving and knocking over the unicorn symbolizes her escape
from the Tyrell corporation, which only looked at her as a replicant.
Deckard fell in love with her as a human, and by doing so, she became
human.
BRDC includes a scene not in the original release. It is a dream sequence,
showing Deckard's dream of a white unicorn. Given this, one can argue that
Gaff left the unicorn outside Deckard's apartment because he knew that Deckard
dreamt of a unicorn. If Gaff knew what Deckard was dreaming, then we can
assume that Deckard was a replicant himself, and Gaff knew he would be dreaming
of a unicorn.
Quoted without permission from Starburst:
-----------------------------------------
Scott: ...did you see the version with the unicorn?
McKenzie: No...
S: I think the idea of the unicorn was a terrific idea...
M: The obvious inference is that Deckard is a replicant himself.
S: Sure. To me it's entirely logical, particularly when you are doing a
film noire, you may as well go right through with that theme, and the
central character could in fact be what he is chasing...
M: Did you actually shoot the sequence in the glade with the unicorn?
S: Absolutely. It was cut into the picture, and I think it worked
wonderfully. Deckard was sitting, playing the piano rather badly
because he was drunk, and there's a moment where he gets absorbed
and goes off a little at a tangent and we went into the shot of the
unicorn plunging out of the forest. It's not subliminal, but it's a
brief shot. Cut back to Deckard and there's absolutely no reaction
to that, and he just carries on with the scene. That's where the
whole idea of the character of Gaff with his origami figures -- the
chicken and the little stick-figure man, so the origami figure of the
unicorn tells you that Gaff has been there. One of the layers of the
film has been talking about private thoughts and memories, so how
would Gaff have known that a private thought of Deckard was of a
unicorn? That's why Deckard shook his head like that [referring to
Deckard nodding his head after picking up the paper unicorn]."
Scott goes on to talk about how he decided to make the photograph of the little
girl with her mother come alive for a second, then later in the interview we
have:
M: Are you disappointed that the references to Deckard being a replicant
are no longer there?
S: The innuendo is still there. Ther French get it immediately! I
think it's interesting that he could be.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CHESS GAME?
Sebastian's chess pieces are birds (he makes animals), Tyrell's are people
(he makes "people").
The chess game between Tyrell and Sebastian uses the conclusion of a game
played between Anderssen and Kieseritzky, in London in 1851. This is one of the
most famous and brilliant games ever played, and is universally known as
"The Immortal Game".
The concept of immortality has obvious associations in the ensuing
confrontation between Tyrell and Batty.
The Immortal Game, in algebraic notation, is as follows:
Anderssen - Kieseritzky
London 1851
1 e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 Bc4 Qh4+ 4 Kf1 b5 5 Bxb5 Nf6 6 Nf3 Qh6 7 d3 Nh5 8 Nh4 Qg5
9 Nf5 c6 10 Rg1 cxb5 11 g4 Nf6 12 h4 Qg6 13 h5 Qg5 14 Qf3 Ng8 15 Bxf4 Qf6
16 Nc3 Bc5 17 Nd5 Qxb2 18 Bd6 Qxa1+ 19 Ke2 Bxg1 20 e5 Na6 21 Nxg7+ Kd8
22 Qf6+ Nxf6 23 Be7 Checkmate.
Note that the chess boards in the film are not arranged as they would be if
they were following the Immortal Game, and that Sebastian's board does not
match Tyrell's.
11. PROBLEMS IN BLADE RUNNER
Plot
----
Why would the Tyrell building have ceiling fans in it?
Why did Holden need to VK Leon, if the police already knew what he looked like?
How did Leon smuggle his gun into room where Holden VK'd him? And how did
he escape from the building, given that the whole incident was on videotape,
and occurred high up in the Tyrell building?
Bryant first tells Deckard that there were six replicants, three male, three
female. Obviously, Roy and Leon are two of the males, and Pris and Zhora are
two of the females. Bryant also says that "one of them got fried trying to
get into the Tyrell building", but doesn't specify the sex. That leaves one
replicant, either male or female.
It has been hypothesized that Deckard was the sixth replicant, but there is
ample evidence that this is not the case:
Some versions of the script include "Mary" as the sixth replicant, which means
that the one that got fried was male, and Deckard can't be the sixth replicant.
Why is it so difficult to tell a replicant from a human, when replicants can
put their hands in boiling/freezing liquids without damage? Surely a tissue
sample would suffice?
How did Rachael get away with killing Leon in public, when she was wanted dead
by the police? The police arrived pretty soon after Deckard killed Zhora, so
why didn't they swoop when Rachael killed Leon?
How did word of Rachael's escape get out so quickly, and how could Tyrell tell
that she had gone for good? Remember that Deckard called Rachael at
home while he was still at the nightclub. It could not have been more than a
couple hours before he gave chase to Zhora. (How long could she "take the
pleasure from the serpent"?) Was that enough time for Rachael to run away, be
gone long enough for Tyrell to call the police about a missing replicant, and
have them tell Bryant to put Deckard onto it?
How did Roy get into Tyrell's office so easily? Did Tyrell trust Sebastian
enough to give him the option of bringing anyone/anything up in the lift?
Supposedly an earlier version of the script had the Tyrell we see as a
replicant, and Roy picking up on this because of the lift letting him in.
(Supposedly the lift was programmed to accept only people that it knew...
meaning that it couldn't detect Roy. This, however leads to a problem in that
the lift would be a better replicant identifier than the VK test.)
In that version the real Tyrell was dead in a "cryocrypt", for sketches of
which see "The Blade Runner Sketchbook". Supposedly (after Roy kills Sebastian)
he finds the crypt and kills Tyrell; this would also allude to "UBIK".
Tyrell tells Roy that "We made you to the best of our abilities", even though
they deliberately gave him a four year lifespan.
Why are real animals so expensive if there are lots of birds living in
Sebastian's building?
Technical
---------
Norwegian subtites translate "Sushi... my ex-wife used to call me that... cold
fish" into "Sushi, my wife, used to call me a cold fish."
In the very first shot of Batty, we see his hand clenching up. If you look
carefully as he turns his hand just before the shot changes, you can see
the nail sticking through the back of his hand. He doesn't actually insert
that nail until later in the film (The nail is easily spotted on the Criterion
CAV laserdisc). [Lots of people having problems spotting this... ]
Also, in the same scene, though Roy is supposedly alone (in a phone booth)
you see someone's hand on his shoulder. This is actually a later scene with
Tyrell, shown in mirror image.
During the VK test, Leon says "My mother... let me tell you about my mother",
but when Deckard runs over this on his way to his apartments, Leon's voice
says "I'll tell you about my mother!".
The snake tattoo on Zhora only appears after the Esper machine has stopped
zooming, and when it produces a hard copy, Zhora's face is at a different angle
to that on the screen.
The serial number that the Cambodian woman gives Deckard is not the same as
the one in the electron microscope image.
When Deckard goes to Ben Hassan's (the snake dealer), their lip movements do
not match the dialog. This scene remains the same in BRDC, which means that
Ridley Scott intended it to be there. [Opinions, anonye?]
When Zhora goes crashing through those plate-glass windows, the stunt double
looks nothinike the actress, and her wounds disappear and appear several
times. The sounds of the bullets hitting her doesn't correspond to when she is
visibly hit.
When Leon throws Deckard into the car window, the window was already broken.
Not necessarily a goof, but could be.
In all versions of the film, events occur in this sequence: Deckard kills
Zhora, and then buys a bottle of Tsing Tao. Gaff grabs him, and takes him
to Bryant. Deckard then chases Rachael, but gets beaten up by Leon.
When the film included Mary, the story ran as follows: Deckard killed Zhora,
and then saw Rachael. He chased Rachael, only to be beaten up by Leon. After
Rachael killed Leon, Bryant THEN bought his bottle of Tsing Tao, and met with
Bryant, who told him that there were "four to go" (Roy, Pris, Mary, and
Rachael).
When they cut Mary from the film, they had a problem: Bryant should say that
there were "three to go" (Roy, Pris, and Rachael). Instead of reshooting this
scene, they moved it (and the scene of Deckard buying Tsing Tao, because Gaff
walks up to him and says "Bryant") to before Leon's death, so that the "four to
go" would be Roy, Pris, LEON (not Mary), and Rachael. They nearly got away
with this, but are now a few problems:
1) When Deckard is talking to Bryant, he shows wounds from his fight
with Leon, although he hasn't had the fight yet.
2) Since he now buys his bottle before he fights Leon, it should be
there while he's chasing Rachael and fighting Leon (it's not). The
bottle mysteriously reappears when he gets back to his flat.
3) Bryant's dialog as he steps out of the spinner is dubbed.
This error is also evident when Bryant tells Deckard at the beginning:
"I've got four skin jobs walking the streets", and then proceeds to tell him
that SIX replicants came to earth, and ONE had been fried (leaving five, not
four).
The song Rachael plays on the piano does not match the music she is looking at.
When Pris steps out of Sebastian's elevator, her hair is dry, but when she
is in the apartment proper, it's wet again.
The cuckoo clock in Sebastian's apartment strikes six twice.
Support cables are visible whenever you see a closeup of a spinner floating
above a city street. The cable is really visible when Gaff takes-off with
Deckard in the beginning of the movie. There is a close-up left profile shot
(front of spinner on left side of the screen) of a spinner rising through the
rain, and the line is very visible. Later when a cop floats down to Deckard
sitting in his car and asks his business, you can see the cable if you look
closely.
Sebastian's and Tyrell's chess boards don't match.
"Ethyl methyl sulphate as an alkylating agent" is chemical nonsense.
In the Deckard/Batty confrontation, after Deckard has been given his gun back
and stalks off, you can see (in letterboxed/widescreen versions) the shadow of
the cameraman and camera on the wall.
When Deckard has attempted to jump the chasm between the buildings, he begins
to fall, and Roy grabs his wrist. There is no nail through Roy's hand. A split
second later, as Roy hauls him up, the nail has returned.
Batty's incept date of January 2016 means that he should have lived to January
2020, however he dies in November 2019.
12. TRIVIA / WHAT MAKES BLADE RUNNER POPULAR/SPECIAL?
Trivia
------
The following characters smoke cigarettes:
Holden, Bryant, Rachael, Pris, lady on video screen.
Deckard kills only women.
Pris' incept date is St Valentine's Day.
Some people claim that Holden's eyes glow after explaining to Leon that the
questions were written down for him.
Gaff's origami taunts Deckard: when Deckard tries to leave Bryant's office
without taking the job, Gaff makes a chicken. Gaff makes a man with a huge
erection to tease Deckard about either being attracted to Rachael, or getting
so involved/excited by the job (when he didn't want it in the first place).
Gaff might have felt that Deckard searching Leon's room was just "jacking off".
The origami evolves: Chicken --> Man --> Unicorn (replicant?)
Eye symbolism is rampant:
- The eye in the opening shots
- Replicants' eyes glow
- Tyrell has huge glasses to make his eyes bigger
- glasses like Tyrell's were used in DADoES for fallout protection
- Eyes are used in the VK test
- Chew's Eye World
- "Chew, if only you could see what I've seen with your eyes!"
- Batty plays with the glass-encased eyes in Sebastian's apartment
- Batty sticks his thumbs in Tyrell's eyes
- "I've SEEN things you people wouldn't believe"
[more?]
The Japanese woman taking pills on the giant screen might be a homage to
Philip K Dick's book "UBIK".
Rachael's picture comes to life momentarily.
Rachael's hairstyle: as a replicant, it is perfect, rigid, machine like, and
cold. As a human, it's soft, curly, and messed up.
The term "Blade Runner" suggests running along a thin edge (blade) one side
being human, the other replicant; it's a fine line between being human and a
replicant.
Blade Runner won the Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation in 1983
(beating out E.T.). In a poll of members of the 1992 World Science Fiction
Convention, Blade Runner was named as the third most favorite SF film of all
time (behind Star Wars and 2001: A Space Odyssey).
From: BLADE RUNNER Production Notes (from the 1982 Presskit)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actors Rutger Hauer, Brion James and James Hong worked for two days
amid icicles at U.S. Growers Cold Storage, Inc.
The "Blade Runner" company also filmed at two of L.A.'s most
beautiful architectural landmarks. The front of the Ennis Brown
house in the Los Feliz area was designed in 1924 by Frank Lloyd
Wright in a Mayan block motif. The building, the most monumental of
Wright's western experimental work, is seen in the film as the
entrance to Harrison Ford's apartment building, a huge condominium
complex, hundreds of stories high.
The Bradbury Building, built in 1893 and recently threatened with
architectural corruption by municipal safety modifications, was
preserved on film by "Blade Runner." In one scene, Ford traces Hauer
to the ornate edifice for the final showdown. In another, industrial
designer J. F. Sebastian (William J. Sanderson) discovers street waif
Pris (Daryl Hannah) and takes her into his apartment.
[...]
Other locations included the downtown Pan Am Building, where Deckard
and Gaff search Leon's hotel room for clues.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebastian's apartment is full of bastardised creatures, part man, part machine,
and part animal.
There is a stuffed unicorn on Sebastian's work table (screen right, as the mice
scurry over scattered paraphernalia while Sebastian sleeps).
Each character is associated with an animal:
Leon = Turtle
Roy = Dove
Zhora = Snake
Rachael = Spider
Tyrell = Owl
Sebastian = Bear
Pris = Raccoon
Deckard = Sushi (raw fish)
When Gaff picks up Deckard, the launch sequence on the computer is exactly
the same as in Scott's _Alien_, when the Nostromo seperates from the Mother
ship. When Deckard enters his apartment at the end, the background hum is the
same distinctive hum as in parts of _Alien_.
Notice that both _Alien_ and BR have "artificial persons", and there
is ambiguity as to who is/was a real human. _Alien_ and BR are perfectly
compatible, the only problem being that Ash should have been a replicant, as
opposed to a robot.
RELIGIOUS/PHILOSOPHICAL PARALLELS:
----------------------------------
The replicants are fallen angels (fell from the heavens/outer space), with Roy
as Lucifer.
Tyrell lives in a gian pyramid (like a Pharaoh), which looks like a cathedral
inside, whereas Sebastian lives in an abandoned apartment with a "toilet bowl
plunger" on his head.
Tyrell creates. He builds his creations imperfect. Once of his creations
resents the inbuilt imperfection (since the creator had no reason apart from
fear to inhibit his creations), and returns to the creator to undo him.
Tyrell's huge bed, pedestaled and canopied, is modeled after the bed of Pope
John Paul II.
Roy:
"Fiery the angels fell,
Deep thunder roll'd around their shores,
Burning with the fires of Orc."
This is a paraphrase of William Blake's _America: A Prophesy_, predicting the
rise of America:
"Fiery the angels rose, and as they rose deep thunder roll'd
Around their shores: indignant burning with the fires of Orc."
Roy deliberately misquotes, indicating he thinks America is in the decline.
When Roy finally confronts Tyrell, he calls him his "maker," and "the god of
biomechanics." In the light of the parallels this film draws between the
plight of the replicants and that of all human being -- four years against
fourscore -- this scene has strange reverberations. If Roy can condemn his
creator for determining his life span at four years, why can we not condemn
our Creator (if we choose to believe in one) for placing us under a death
sentence at birth. Can we sit in judgment of God?
In so far as he creates artificial life and is killed by it, Tyrell is another
Dr. Frankenstein; but there the similarity ends. He is punished not for
breaking God's law, but for wronging his creations. And Roy -- robot, child,
monster, demigod -- is not an obscenity to be returned to oblivion as soon as
Roy puts a nail through his palm.
When Batty dies, he is released from torment as he releases the dove. Only
shot of blue sky. (The laserdisc notes say that they couldn't get the dove to
fly off into the rain.)
13. MORE QUESTIONS/ANSWERS
Q: Whose eye is it at the start of the movie?
A: The storyboard says that it is Holden's
Q: What does the voice from the blimp say?
A: "A new life awaits you in the Off-World colonies. The chance to begin again
in a golden land of opportunity and adventure. New climate, recreational
facilities.....absolutely free. Use your new fried as a personal body
servant or a tireless field hand--the custom tailored genetically engineered
humanoid replicant designed especially for your needs. So come on America,
let's put our team up there...."
Q: Why can't Tyrell afford a real owl?
A: The screenplay was written as:
Deckard: "It's artificial?"
Rachael: "Of course not."
I believe this is how it was shot. If you watch Rachael's lips when she is
saying this, it looks like an overdub. Hard to see except in a theater.
Tyrell may want to keep a replicant owl in his penthouse, the same as
most companies have showpiece models in their offices.
Note further that in DADoES, the "Tyrell corporation" lied to Deckard
(that is, told him it was real) as an attempted bribe.
Q: Who is the guy lying down in the photo Deckard uses in his image processor? A: Roy?
Q: Why are both of the people sleeping in the picture?
[and is this significant?]
Q: How did Gaff get Deckard's gun? Was he following them?
A: Deckard sits on the roof for a long time. Gaff probably followed Deckard's
groundcar, or checked out the radio reports of Sebastian's death, walked
around to piece together what happened, then found Deckard's gun.
Q: Which companies have their logos appearing in BR?
A: Coca-Cola, Atari, Bell, TDK [others?]
Q: What is this "Blade Runner Curse"?
A: Someone once noticed that a large proportion of the companies whose logos
appeared in BR had financial difficulties after the film was released. The
most notable of these was Bell, which was split into AT&T and others.
[more info, anyone?]
14. IS DECKARD A REPLICANT?
This question causes the most debate among BR fans. The different versions
of BR support this notion to differing degrees. One might argue that in the
theatrical release (1982), Deckard is not a replicant, but in BRDC, he is not.
There is no definitive answer: Ridley Scott himself has stated that, although
he deliberately made the ending ambiguous, he also intentionally introduced
enough evidence to support the notion, and (as far as he is concerned), Deckard
is a replicant.
[Starburst]
The "for" case
--------------
- Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford have stated that Deckard was meant to be a
replicant:
Noise-free post from October 1992 Details (Discussions on Blade Runner);
reprinted without permission:
FORD: "Blade Runner was not one of my favorite films. I tangled
with Ridley. The biggest problem was that at the end, he wanted the
audience to find out that Deckard was a replicant. I fought that
because I felt the audience needed somebody to cheer for."
- Gaff knew that Deckard dreamt of a unicorn, therefore Gaff knew what dreams
that Deckard had been implanted with. (BRDC only)
- Replicants have a penchant for photographs, because it gives them a tie to
their non-existent past. Deckard's flat is packed with photos, and none of
them are recent or in color.
- Only a replicant could survive the beatings that Deckard takes, and then
pull itself up onto the roof with two fingers.
- Deckard's eyes glow (blue-gray) when he tells Rachael that he wouldn't go
after her, "but someone would". This is hard to spot: Deckard is standing
behind Rachael, and he's out of focus.
- Deckard's character is much like Holden's.
- If you listen closely in the audio dissolve during Rachael's VK test, you can
hear Deckard say "orange body, green legs". How did he know that this was
significant to Rachael?
- Gaff tells him "You've done a man's job!"
- Gaff seems to follow Deckard everywhere - he is at the scene of all the
Replicant retirings almost immediately. Gaff is always with Deckard when
the chief is around. This suggests that Gaff is the real BR, and that
Deckard is only a tool Gaff uses to do the dirty work.
The "against" case
------------------
- A major point of the film was to show Deckard (The Common Man) the
value of life. "What's it like to live in fear?" If all the main characters
become replicants, the contrast between humans and replicants is lost.
- Rachael was the one with an implanted unicorn dream, Deckard dreamt of the
unicorn (BRDC) as both he and Gaff viewed Rachael's implants.
- Rachael had memories to give her emotions a cushion. Leon had photos.
If Deckard was a replicant with memory implants, then he doesn't need
the photos.
- Why send a replicant to kill other replicants? What was Deckard doing on
Earth, if replicants are outlawed there? Why did the police trust him?
- Replicants don't feel pain unless they are dying, but Deckard shows signs
of being in pain.
NOTES
This file has been primarily compiled from my own viewings of Blade Runner,
debates on the net, and private email messages. The contributors are too
numerous to mention, and likewise this task would never have been completed
had I replied to everyone that sent me mail.
Special thanks to:
Peter Merel (pete@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU)
Geoff Wright (gmw4432@bcstec.ca.boeing.com)
William M. Kolb
Michael Kaufman (kaufman@delta.eecs.nwu.edu)
Steve Griffiths (etlsngs@etlxd20.ericsson.se)
Juhana Kouhia (kouhia@nic.funet.fi)
Please don't be offended if you don't get a reply, or if I don't include your
views in the FAQ. If your opinions don't make it into the FAQ, it's for
one of the following reasons:
1) I didn't get your mail.
2) The explanation/rebuttal is already in the file.
If particular questions keep being brought up, I'll
try to clarify the relevant areas of the FAQ.
3) The point is irrelevant or insignificant.
A lot of the feedback I've received is of the type:
"This wasn't denied in the film, so it must be true."
Sorry, this file is too big already for speculations.
4) It is generally accepted that (you are wrong | it is unclear).
Remember, other people have different views. I'm specifically
referring to the "Deckard is a replicant" question. Half of
you tell me that he is a replicant, and half tell me that
he isn't. *I* am in the best position to decide what is
the consensus of opinion. I have tried to provide a balanced
and objective viewpoint.
At present, I have no plans to form a mailing list, however this may change,
depending on how many people are interested. My policy stands like this at the
moment: If you don't have access to net news, I'll mail it to you. If you
still don't get it, that means the mail has bounced, and you should try again,
possibly with a different return address.
This FAQ has generated enormous interest. I get approximately 10 to 15 mail
messages a day about it.
ðTHE AMIGA 1200 IS HERE
Short after the introduction of the Amiga 4000, Commodore
introduces the A1200. This computer takes CBM a great step
closer to the mainstream of desktop computing. With its low
price and the surprisingly gaudy array of standard features,
there is no doubt that the A1200 will make a good replacement
for the older Amiga 500.
At the very beginning of the Amiha era, Commodore released the
A1000 back in 1985 with a Motorola 68000 CPU. Then came the
A2000, A500 and A600 - all with the same processor. With the
release of the A1200, CBM indicates that the days of the 68000
CPU are over.
The A1200's 14Mhz 68020 system incorporates Commodore's nGA
(Advanced Graphic Architecture) chip set. The base machine
comes with 2MB of Chip RAM, one 880Kb floppy drive, and a
PCMCIA slot. This is the same interface as on the A600 and
CDTV, and it appears it is becoming standard on all but
high-end Amiga computers. The operating system is the same as
the one introduced with the A4000, namely AmigaDOS.
In the A1200 there is an expansion slot similar to the one in
the A500, which supports a 150-pin local bus-expansion
adaptor that can be used to add more RAM, a coprocessor, a CPU
accelerator, or even a SCSI interface. An additional 8MB of
RAM can be added, bringing the total to 10MB.
Hard disk is a must with any computer, and the A1200 comes
with an internal IDE hard-disk interface. There is room for
an optional 2.5-inch IDE hard drive in the machine. I would
have preferred a SCSI interface, because this is superior to
the IDE interface - and would have given the users access to
the numerous SCSI devices.
Unlike the A600, the A1200 comes complete with a numeric
keypad on the keyboard. The new Amiga is of course also
equipped with all the standard Amiga ports for mouse,
joystick, external floppies, serial, parallell, and video
(RGBA, VGA, SVGA, composite).
But the main attraction in the A1200 is the use of the
second-generation Amiga chip set. The AGA chips are the heart
and soul of the new line of Amiga computers. The new chips
support a palette with true 24-bit color capability, meaning
it can make use of more than 16 million colors! In terms of
actual display, the number of colors that can be displayed at
one time now ranges from 2 to a mere 256.000. Using up to 8
bitplanes, screens of up to 256 colors are available in normal
display modes; in the new HAM8 mode, these same 8 bitplanes
can create 256.000-color displays that rival the true 24-bit
displays!
The range of screen sizes that are possible with AGA also far
exceeds that of earlier Amiga chips. In addition to the old
sizes (320*200 to 640*400), you can now create screens of
800*600, 640*960, 1280*400, or 1312*512, all of which can use
up to the full 8 bitplanes of color!
ð A FEW GOOD MEN
Director: Rob Reiner.
Running time: 138 mins.
Actors: Tom Cruise, Demi Moore, Jack Nicholson, Kevin Bacon
Kiefer Sutherland
For some reason I can't figure out, this film has become a
huge success. To me, the only entertaining and positive
aspects of this film are Kevin Bacon and Jack Nicholson, and
even he isn't up to his regular standards. And why does every
bleedin' Hollywood director have to make a courtroom drama??
The plot is simple (of course). Lieutenant and part-time
lawyer Daniel Kaffee (Cruise) and JoAnne Galloway (Moore)
investigate the murder of a young marine at a U.S. naval base
in Cuba. Gradually, it becomes clear that this matter goes
all the way to the top, involving Colonel Jessep (Nicholson).
The two legal eagles then attempt to wrap it up in a grand
Court House finale.
The major problem with A Few Good Men, as with nearly all
American films, is that it is just too... yes, American!! I
won't go into detail, just sum it up by stating that many
passages simply are pathetic. There is an overflow cliches,
and the "my-daddy-was-much-better-than-me-at-this-and-it-is-
about-time-I-step-out-of-his-shadow" syndrom is definately
used up in American cinema. The story just isn't good enough,
and the average performances by the two leads doesn't make it
any better. Demi Moore isn't that bad, but Tom Cruise isn't
convincing at all. I have also seen Jack Nicholson better
than this, although he is once again making the best out of
his role. Kevin Bacon is the surprise in the line-up,
outplaying his more famous co-stars. He deserves an Oscar
nomination, but probably won't get any.
In conclusion, I must say that if you are thinking about
watching A Few Good Men, think it over, and spend your money a
little wiser. Thise of you who are fans of Rob Reiner; rent
The Princess Bride on video instead!
Story : 4 out of 10
Acting : 5
Music : 5
Directing : 3
Overall : 4
ð ALONE AGAIN!
Director: Chris Columbus
Running Time: approx. 122 mins.
Actors: Macaulay Culkin, Joe Pesci, Daniel Stern.
It happens again! The chicago family once again forget one of
the kids back home when they go on holiday. Only this time,
the kid is lost in New York. After checking in on a plane to
Florida, the kid (whose name I don't remember) got on a plane
to NEW YORK! Of course the rest of the family doesn't
discover this until they see the hot beaches of Miami.
The boy (still in N.Y.) manages to rent a hotel suite - using
his father's VISA card. Truly amazing. And then he meets the
same bad guys as in "Home Alone" - who are planning to rob a
toy store. Our kid is of course superior this time as well,
and by keeping track on the bad guys throughout the movie, he
manages to get them into the huge house of his aunt and uncle.
Luckily, the owners of the house are on holiday (in Barbados
or somewhere else), and the kid can play around with the
crooks like he did in "Home Alone".
In addition to this, he meets with a poor, old lady. During a
15 minute long session, the lady and the kid sit down and talk
about all the problems of life. This is the most boring part
of the movie, and the sentimental bullshit never seems to end.
But it does. And in the end, the kid not only scares the
thieves off the crime scene, he also catches them and hands
them over to the police. By now, the whole family has
cancelled the Florida holiday, and they are all in N.Y., where
they meet with their little hero in a tear-jerked scene.
This is one of those total brain dead movies which many people
go to see simply because they have nothing else to do. But -
if you feel a sudden need to spend US$ 5 on a movie then I
urge you not to spend them on this movie! Why not send the
money to me and sit home and watch episode #792 of Santa
Barbara in stead? It'll give you far more pleasure than Home
Alone 2, I promise!
Story : 1 out of 10
Acting : 2
Music : 5
Directing : 2
Overall : 2
ð THE HIDDEN (!) ARTICLE
©Yep - you found it! BOO! Seriously, I just wanted to in-
©clude some greets here.... Hello dudes - here are some
©greetings from Micro-Pal to
911
Airforce
Alis
Big Brother
Bob
Brainbug
Bros
Bustman
Cevin Key
Christoph Glang
Control
Delusion
Disney
Ducky
Gizmo
G0blin
Greg
Green Beret
Hacky
Head
Hornet
Ice!
Inzane
Ironcode
IT
Jabbawocky
Jason
JBM
Kaoz&Raven
Lazerbrain
Lector
Liberator
Lizardking
Lord Voice
Mr. Thompson
Necronom
Neptun
Notch11
Orbit
Ozone
Ozzy
PGCS
Playboy
Raj-Ban
Rastan
Rebel
Rincewind
Shockbyte
Stanley
Stryper
Tactel
Teo
The Animal
The Biker
The Professor
Tony
Valium
Vishnu
Warrior
Will Scarlett
Zig Zag
ð THE GATHERING '93
ð THE GATHERING '93
ð SCENE NEWS
Here follows the latest gossip in the scene. I got a brand
new idea this time: To sort the news by the group name - in
alphabetical order! So here we go:
ºALCATRAZ
Will also release at least 2 music compilations in the
spring of 1993 containing music by Lizardking, Brainbug
and Greg.
Surprise, surprise: McDisk #6 is delayed.
Control will not quit the scene as stated in the Eurochart.
The news in the EC was pure bullshit.
Style/Legend joined and became the mail WHQ. He then left,
then rejoined and then he finally left because he wanted
to make a demo together with Blacky. PGCS is still the WHQ
- and will always be.
ºANARCHY
Will use the same articles as in McDisk #6 for their Stolen
Data #12-13 issue. This has been made possible through a
cooperation between some of the article writers in the
scene.
ºCRYPTOBURNERS
Will make a comeback during the winter/spring of 1993. Has
already released the ProTracker v3.0, and a lot of new
releases are due soon.
Releases to come at The Gathering '93:
ProTracker v3.1
??????
Has got a new WHQ BBS:
"Home Alone" N1 +47-(0)70-40297
N2 +47-(0)70-40305
ºCRYSTAL (MELON DEZIGN)
Seen and Paleface will try to make even cooler productions in
the future. PMC should watch out and not write bullshit about
Melon Dezign in R.A.W. - because if not, the entire editor
crew at R.A.W. will be bombed.
ºDEADLINE SF
Is in war with the German ATZ leader-duo Head and Control.
They think that both Head and Control are some assholes and
they will see to that some really bad rumours shock the scene
soon. In the end, they promised to go down to Germany and rape
Control's girlfriend.
ºINDEPENDENT
Is a new group with a lot of members from all over Europe.
There will be a lot of independent productions this year.
Diceman is a new member in Norway.
ºPURE METAL CODERS
Will probably release R.A.W. 5 2/3 at The Gathering 1993.
There will at least be a preview of this issue available at
The Gathering.
Alpha and Omega 3 will be on 7 disks.
ºSPACEBALLS
Has entered a cooperation with Skid Row. Their next demo will
perhaps be ready for The Gathering '93 - and this time the
demo has a brand new trackloader system. It will also be
runable on the following configurations:
A500 OS1.3 and OS2.0
A1000 OS1.3 (Phoenix only.)
A1500 OS1.3
A2000 OS1.3 and OS2.0 and with any 030 accelerator.
A2500/020 OS1.3 only
A3000 - the plain machine w/o HD
A600-1200-4000 will not be supported this time either, but
according to Skid Row members there will be released a patch
later on.
ºSTATIC BYTES
Will soon release a demo called "Nu ska' vi se om vi finner
nogle karameller i skuffen."
ºTHE SILENTS
Kyd-Balle will hold a concert at Wembley Stadium on October
1993. There will be great laser shows, and maybe a guest
performance by Jean Michel Jarre.
ðBUSTS - THE FUTURE
Give me back my broken night
my secret room, my secret life
it's lonely here,
There's no one left to torture
Give me absolute control
over every living soul
And lie beside me, baby,
that's an order!
Give me crack and anal sex
Take the only tree that's left
and stuff it up the hole
in your culture
Give me back the Berlin wall
give me Stalin and St. Paul
I've seen the future, brother:
it is murder.
You don't know me from the wind
you never will, you never did
I'm the little jew
who wrote the bible
I've seen nations rise and fall
I've heard their stories, heard them all
but love's the only engine of survival
Your servant here, he has been told
to say it clear, to say it cold:
It's over, it ain't going
any further
And now the wheels of heaven stop
you feel the devil's riding crop
Get ready for the future:
it is murder.
Leonard Cohen, 1992
-------------------------
This text by Leonard Cohen can be interpreted in many ways.
But in general, he is not looking at the future in a very
positive way. And I regret to say that I agree with the guy.
The situation for Amiga phreaks will be the same as for the
rest of the people in our society. Crisis after crisis are
passing by, and when it comes to BBSes there will be more and
more busts, I think. WHY? Because the BBS-scene is more
turning into illegal operations such as Calling- and Credit
Card fraud, and in the end, the net will close around them.
The worst thing about this is that there are many innocent
people who pay their phone bills and calls lots of PD Systems
around the globe, and these PD systems may also be suspected
for illegal operations! Because the present situation is that
the police have no or very little knowledge of the Amiga
scene, and they tend to think that it is an illegal scene all
over. Somebody should tell them about all the demos, music
disks, slideshows, friendship, legal partys etc...
Today, more and more Amiga phreaks are considered to be
criminals because they once played Kick Off 2 (pirate copy)!
The software companies are almost hysteric, and they are not
sure about how they shall react towards - or attack - the
pirate "industry". Let's hope that they attack only the real
pirates and leaves us phreaks alone!
ð µCOMING RELEASES FROM ALCATRAZ¡
Alcatraz hasn't released much lately. This is due to the
fact that many members are working for different software
companies, and therefore busy doing work for the commercial
market.
Peanuts (or McDisk) has not been released on a regular
basis, like we promised last year, and we are sorry for
this. There was simply no time left... we have receieved
letters from people who want us to come back, all I can say
is: Don't worry, we will. But it may take some time, so
please be patient!
However, we are trying to create a huge product in 1994
called TEAMWORK. You might say that this will be the
"follow-up" to ODYSSEY, but it will not have direct
parallells to the Odyssey story. It will feature work from
a number of Alcatraz members, and also AGA parts. TEAMWORK
will be the greatest scene production ever made on Amiga -
just wait and see. A TEAMWORK INTRO will be released later
this year.
Alcatraz - Together for Teamwork'94!
Disney is now the Alcatraz WHQ PO Box 49
Write for "almost anything" A-8650 KINDBERG
AUSTRIA
For Peanuts votes, diskback TEO/Alcatraz
service, and articles (!), Vassosvn. 14
please write to TEO. N-8481 BLEIK
NORWAY
Note that I (Micro-Pal) do not have any spare time to answer
letters, so please send your fan letters to Disney or TEO.
For anything concerning Peanuts, you should call the Alcatraz
WHQ if you have a modem, if you don't - write to TEO! NOW!
...and remember: Send only "legal" stuff to the ATZ members!
ð µ-COPYRIGHT NOTICE-¡
Peanuts - or any other Alcatraz production - may
ºnot be sold by ºanyone, no matter how low or
practically non-existing the profit is. This
release is entirely produced by Alcatraz
members, and can be copied freely as long as no
money is involved.
If you have paid money in order to get this or
any other Alcatraz release, then somebody is
ºcheating on you! Please send the addresses of
people or companies who sell Peanuts, McDisk or
any other Alcatraz production to:
PO Box 49
A-8650 KINDBERG
AUSTRIA
ð µTHE CREDITS FOR THIS RELEASE¡
Concept, Editing ............. ©MICRO-PAL/Alcatraz (Norway)
Coding, Design, Fonts .......... ©DISNEY/Alcatraz (Austria)
Acoustics: "Vanja" ............ ©BRAINBUG/Alcatraz (Norway)
Dancer-Pic, Logo ............. ©ILUVATAR/Alcatraz (Austria)
Moral Support ................. ©BOB/Banana Dezign (Norway)
©DISNEY/Alcatraz (Austria)
©TEO/Alcatraz (Norway)
Articles written by: ©MICRO-PAL/Alcatraz (Norway)
©WREKO/Balance (Denmark)
©MURRAY CHAPMAN/Ind. (Australia)
©JAMES BERARDINELLI/Ind. (Italy)
ð- NEW MOVIES TO COME -
123456789012345678901234567890123456789--987654321098765432109876543210987654321
ð BUSTS - The History
It all started several years back, when the first Bulletin
Board Systems popped up. Most of them had Public Domain stuff
only on them, but some boards got new, commercial, software
very, very fast. And throughout the years, the number of
boards increased rapidly. Worldwide, we are now talking about
a 5-digit number of BBSes!!! BUT: A vast majority of these are
Public Domain boards - let's not forget that!
Earlier, people were mostly swapping programs via mail. And
this mailswapping is still going on. This friendship-swapping
has been concidered legal for a long time, but now the
software companies - and a partnership of these - try to put
pressure on different governments in order to have them change
the laws. In the end it just might result in that all copying
to friends will be forbidden. (Perhaps even backup copying
will be forbidden one day - who knows ?!?)
Piracy was - and is, according to the software companies, a
huge industry. Companies such as Ocean, System 3, Sierra etc.
claim to have lost billions of US dollars due to the pirate
"industry". That just might be the case - if the companies
assume they would have earned money on every pirate copy ever
made if piracy had never existed.
Some years ago, the first pirate BBSes were busted. But the
increasing number of new boards has been so great compared to
the number of closed BBSes, that one couldn't really talk
about "many busts". Now, however, the matter has changed a
bit. The investigators are getting quite active in the scene,
and by infiltrating the it - as independent traders or even
members of wellknown groups - they have an utopia: To stop
piracy once and for all!
ð BUSTS - Current Action
It's six o'clock in the morning. The dorbell rings. "Who the
fuck are at the door at this time of the day?" you ask, and
want to continue sleeping. But there it is again - the
doorbell. It isn't a dream after all. You get up, put on a
pair of jeans and a white t-shirt. Shit - it has a couple of
Heinz spots on it... damnit - is there never a clean t-shirt
when you need it the most !!!
"RiiiiiiiiiNG !!!!" .... gee hold on for a God darned minute!
You rush out into the hall and towards the front door. As you
open it, you discover that there are two guys standing
outside. One of them shows you a little ID card and starts
talking: "We are from the police, and we have a search
warrant for this house." Thoughts are tumbling inside your
head.... "Police"... "Search warrant"... What the heck is
this ?!?
- - - - - - -
Now, this has been reality for quite a number of Amiga phreaks
the latest months. Especially sysops, but also some so called
"modem traders" have been tracked down and interrogated by the
police.
The raids done by the police in Belgium, Finland, Germany,
Holland, Norway and Sweden include more than 50 Bulletin Board
Systems. The organization Business Software Alliance - or BSA
- is the software companies' main investigator. This
organization has modem traders and people in the Amiga scene,
who are trying to infiltrate the modem scene as well as
cracking groups. And they must be doing pretty well since so
many boards are closed down.
Or are they? There has been few convictions in these cases.
The phreaks often get their equipment back - togheter with an
excuse from the police because they have no case at all. Lack
of computer knowledge as well as lack of evidence causes them
to close the cases, without "solving" them in a proper way -
from BSA's point of view.
BSA is now awaiting a trial in Sweden. The trial is currently
running, and everybody are excited about what the outcome will
be. The authorities are trying to get a sysop convicted, and
if he is found guilty, BSA promises to attack about 100 BBSes
in Sweden.
ð BUSTS - An Analysis
The software companies finally had to take action. They
couldn't accept the steady increase of piracy any longer.
ðEPILOGUE
Next issue of Peanuts will be released on October 1st, 1993.
We'll have more info on The Party III - and the 'ol 500 demo
vs. the AGA demo fight, as well as information about other
exciting events. We'll also start a 'mini-series' about all
the busts and illegal activities in the scene. This is going
to be quite revealing, so stay tuned!
Last words..... make sure to send your votes in time, better
put them in the mailbox today :-)
ðPROLOGUE
ºI know you maybe thought Peanutsº was dead, but this release
ºproves the opposit. After a long, dull and lazy period,
ºwe decided to get back to you. The past months have been
ºquite relaxing, and due to the "I-am-tired-of-the-scene"
ºsyndrome, Alcatraz hasn't released anything for a long time.
However, we are back now, and ºPeanuts will be released on a
regular basis; released every month on the 1st. There are no
changes in the controls; use the arrow keys to scroll!
µCREDITS:¡
Editor .................... Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
Code ......................... Disney / Alcatraz
Acoustics: "Vanja" ......... Brainbug / Alcatraz
Graphics ................... Iluvatar / Alcatraz
Additional Graphics .......... Disney / Alcatraz
Moral Support .............. Bob / Banana Dezign
Disney / Alcatraz
Teo / Alcatraz
Articles by ......: Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
Wreko / Balance
Murray Chapman / Ind.
James Berardinelli / Ind.
We started off back in early 1992 as a ©"Pack-Mag", concen-
trating on the on-disk files (demos/intros) and not the con-
tents of the Magazine itself. Well, we intend to change that
priority a bit and make ºPeanuts more like a ©"Mag-Pack".. (?)
Thus meaning we'll have more articles and kind of turn a bit
more into a Mini-diskmag.
We'll try to have a few ºinteresting articles, and not be-
come a "two-disks-full-of-crap" diskmag. We hope to get some
support from you - ºthe readers! - because it's for you we're
making this little magazine.
In the µJoyride¡ directory you can read the >funny< stuff and
some hot gossip on the scene. Please send all the news you
might have, because this directory is here to stay! (Huh....
who on earth knows what's next in Peanuts :-))
(eh... . the Joyride directory will open next month, when we
have received some news...)
A new area in ºPeanuts is the charts section. We felt charts
is something that a lot of people like, and if you have any
suggestions on how to improve the charts, please don't hesi-
tate to give us some feedback!
A lot of you people out there are also waiting for more
ºAlcatraz releases, I know. Don't despair! An all-new huge
production is on the sketchboard!!! Read all about it in the
miscellaneous directory.
Enjoy the September 1993 issue of Peanuts -- we're back here
to stay now.
©Micro-Pal / Alcatraz
PS! If you like Peanuts, buy it :-) ...no, but if you like
it, please concider giving a donation - an article! We
can't survuve without ºyour help, so if you'd like us to grow
and get better, ºplease support us!
On-Disk this time are some utilities that might come in
handy, as well as some scene-related stuff.
There is no selector present, just boot up your favourite
Amiga WorkBench and access the files from there. I favour
this way of giving you the files, so that you can put them
onto your HD, favourite utility disk/directory etc. by your-
self. If you do decide to use the files included, please
concider giving the creators a little donation (read the doc
files that are accompanied with the utils for more info).
I took the liberty of packing the source files into lha
archieves, as I reckon most coders do have access to the
archiever in question.
Here follows a brief description of the files included:
Dir: Description:
------------------------------------------------------------
PSM Public Screen Manager, Get control of your
screens. Read the readme file in the directory
for more information.
StickIt Utility that helps you to get rid of all those
Post-It notes lying around... This will keep
track on everything your Post-It notes did be-
fore, only in a much more structured way.
SysInfo Version 3.22 of the classic SysInfo utility.
It's a bit old, I know, but I included it after
all since I think that all Amiga users out
there ought to have it; try it.
TitleClock Small utility to put a clock in your public
screen's upper right corner. Very small, takes
almost no CPU time at all, so I thought: "What
the heck" :-)
TM TrashMaster v1.6 - the ultimate WB file trasher.
You know, there has been times you were working
in your WB, and you wanted a file deleted, and
not just moved into the "Trashcan" directory.
Well, this is the solution. Lots of features -
check it out!
Intros Some intros - amongst them the first official
partyinvitation intro from Silents, Lemon. and
Spaceballs. Lean back and enjoy!
---------------------------------------------------[EOF]----
ð ALCATRAZ WHQ BBS
Running on CNET 3.X, more than 50 file areas (and many free
downloads!), more than 50 msg areas, Internatioal NetMail,
McDisk, Peanuts and Teamwork'94 areas, online games and
other entertainment doors, online vote support, chatable
sysop, both Amiga and PC areas, large picture area, CALL!!!
ð +47-7769-5151
ð UNFORGIVEN
Director: Clint Eastwood.
Running time: approx. 125 mins.
Actors: Clint Eastwood, Gene Hackman, Richard Harris,
Morgan Freeman.
This western might be one of the very last films for the actor
Clint Eastwood. He desires to, and probably will, dedicate
himself fully to his other self - the director Clint Eastwood.
This would obviously be a tragic loss to all his faithful
fans.
In Unforgiven, he both directs and stars as an old gunman,
William Munny. He has been retired for years, having been
reformed by his now deceased wife. One day he gets a visit
from a punk who wants Munny´s help in catching a couple of
cowboys who have mutilated a whore. Munny hesitantly accepts,
because he needs the money offered. He is joined by his pal
Ned (Freeman) as they go hunting the cowboys. I won´t reveal
any more of the plot, just mention that there is an immense
bloodbath towards the end of the film, emphasizing the quite
violent tone throughout. Clint portrays himself as an
anti-hero, and huge Clint fans might be disappointed by
watching their idol not being able to hit a can from a five
meter range (!), and repeatedly falling off a horse trying to
get on it.
The theme of the film is that violence solves no problems, and
Clint has decided to explicitly show this by maintaining a
high level of violence throughout the movie. However, I don´t
think he fully succeeds in bringing about this theme, and
therefore Unforgiven can´t be regarded (at least not by me) as
a brilliant film. It is very good, however. It has a good
and realistic story, and first and foremost: brilliant
actors. Clint Eastwood has never been better, Gene Hackman is
outstanding as sheriff Little Bill, and Morgan Freeman and
Richard Harris are solid as always. My personal prediction:
Hackman gets an Oscar for Best Supporting Role.
Story : 7 out of 10
Acting : 9
Music : 5
Directing : 6
Overall : 7
ðTWIN PEAKS
ðFIRE WALK WITH ME
- a David Lynch film -
Director: David Lynch
Running time: approx. 135 mins.
Actors: Kyle McLaclan, David Bowie, David Lynch.
Everything is blue. The background is somewhat getting
clearer. It is blue and white. Zooming out. It's a TV set
which has not yet been turned off - even if the transmission
has ended. All of a sudden a man throws an axe straight into
the set.
That's exactly how the movie takes off. This film tells us
the story prior to what happened in the TV series of Twin
Peaks. We get to see Laura Palmer - and taste a bit of her
wild life. She is a drug addict who has hallusinations all
the time. Why? Twin Peaks is assumingly more weird than
ever. Or is it?
The David Lynch films have their own category: "David Lynch
films". This one is of course no exception. You have to be a
true fan in order to enjoy this film fully.
The little community of Twin Peaks is a very mysterious place.
Every person, every family
PeAnUtS ---